Magnesium: Which Form, Which Test, and Who Actually Needs It
Executive summary
Magnesium is not a fringe micronutrient. It acts as a cofactor for more than 300, and by some more recent tallies over 600, of the body's enzymatic reactions, including the generation of ATP (the molecule cells spend to do their work), the control of nerve and muscle excitability, and the synthesis of DNA and protein (Ref 1, Ref 2, Ref 3).
Inadequate intake is common. Depending on the population and the cut-off used, somewhere between roughly a third and a half of people surveyed fall short of requirements or show subclinical deficiency. No single figure should be treated as exact (Ref 5, Ref 6, Ref 7).
The standard serum magnesium test is a weak guide to whole-body stores, because only about one per cent of the body's magnesium sits in the blood. A "normal" serum result can sit alongside genuine tissue depletion. Red blood cell (RBC) magnesium is a better proxy, though it is not flawless either (Ref 6, Ref 8).
The figure on a supplement label is usually the weight of the whole compound, not the elemental magnesium that does the work. Reading the elemental figure is the single most useful habit a buyer can adopt.
Whether the different salts (citrate, glycinate, oxide, taurate, malate, L-threonate) genuinely differ in usefulness is less settled than social media suggests. My own view is that form probably matters, but I hold it loosely and would revise it if stronger head-to-head data appeared.
For specific problems the evidence ranges from reasonable (blood pressure, migraine, constipation) through preliminary and often industry-funded (L-threonate for cognition) to frankly weak (malate for fibromyalgia, oral magnesium for pregnancy leg cramps). I have tried to grade each honestly rather than flatten them into one confident claim.
The safety point I hold most firmly: long-term acid-suppressing drugs (proton pump inhibitors) can deplete magnesium, occasionally to dangerous levels. If you take one, this is worth testing, not worth stopping on your own.
I have no commercial interest in any magnesium product, no brand affiliation, discount code, or affiliate link. What follows is a reading of the biology and the trials, and all of the references were retrieved and checked through PubMed.
Introduction
Magnesium is having a moment. It is on every shelf, in every wellness feed, and increasingly on the list of things patients arrive already taking. When something reaches that level of popularity, my instinct is not to join the enthusiasm or to dismiss it, but to slow down and ask a narrower question: what does the biochemistry actually require, what have the trials actually measured, and where does the confident marketing outrun the evidence?
I should declare my position at the outset. I do not sell magnesium, I hold no affiliation with any brand, and I have no financial interest in whether you supplement or not. My interest is clinical and, frankly, educational. I trained first in dentistry, then in dermatology, and separately in anti-aging medicine and in metabolic medicine, and across that work the same pattern keeps appearing: a mineral that is genuinely central to physiology, routinely under-measured, and then oversold in a way that obscures the few things about it that are actually useful to know.
This piece tries to separate those threads. It covers what magnesium does, how deficiency presents and why it is easy to miss, why the standard blood test can mislead, how to read a label, whether the fashionable distinctions between forms hold up, who genuinely stands to benefit, and how to think about testing and dosing. Throughout, I have tried to state what a study found and then, in the same breath, what it does not establish. That is the only honest way to write about a supplement.
What magnesium actually does
It helps to hold three roles in mind, because the rest of the article hangs off them.
The first is making ATP. Adenosine triphosphate is the small molecule a cell spends whenever it does anything, and magnesium is required to form and use it; biologically active ATP exists largely as a magnesium-ATP complex (Ref 1, Ref 2). A reasonable analogy is a rechargeable battery: ATP is the charged battery the cell drains to power its machinery, and magnesium is part of what lets the battery be assembled and discharged at all. When it is scarce, it is not surprising that unexplained fatigue is one of the symptoms people report.
The second is controlling excitability at the cell membrane. Magnesium regulates the movement of calcium and potassium across membranes and behaves, in effect, as a natural brake on over-excitable cells (Ref 2, Ref 4). Picture a doorman on the calcium channel: when magnesium is present, the door does not fly open at every knock. When it is low, nerve and muscle cells fire too readily, which is the mechanistic thread running through cramps, twitches, restless legs, a racing or skipping heartbeat, and that hard-to-place sense of being wired.
The third is building things. Magnesium is needed for the synthesis of DNA and protein and for cell division, and it helps stabilise the membranes of the mitochondria where ATP is made (Ref 1, Ref 3). From a longevity standpoint that reframes it: less a garnish on the plate, more part of the structural scaffolding a cell needs to copy and repair itself.
None of this is controversial. It is textbook physiology, and it is the reason a real deficiency can show up in so many different systems at once.
How common is shortfall, and why it is easy to miss
Estimates vary because the definition varies. Surveys that measure dietary intake against requirements tend to find that a large minority, sometimes around half of the sample, fall short (Ref 6). Studies that measure blood or cellular magnesium in apparently healthy people find a meaningful proportion below the reference limit (Ref 7). A fair summary is that inadequacy is common enough to take seriously and variable enough that you should distrust any single headline percentage, including the ones I have just cited. What is not in doubt is that this is a genuine, widespread shortfall rather than a marketing invention (Ref 5).
The reasons are unglamorous: modern diets, food processing, and the fact that several common medications quietly increase losses. I will come back to the medications, because one of them matters more than the others.
The blood test problem: serum versus red-cell magnesium
This is the point I most want a reader to leave with, because it changes how you interpret a result you may already have been given.
The magnesium test a doctor orders by default is serum magnesium, the amount circulating in the blood plasma. The difficulty is that only about one per cent of the body's magnesium is in the blood at all; the remaining ninety-nine per cent is held in bone, muscle, and the inside of cells (Ref 1, Ref 6). The body defends the blood level tightly, pulling magnesium out of storage to keep serum in range. So serum can read comfortably normal while the tissue that actually uses magnesium is running low. An analogy: checking the water pressure at a single tap tells you the tap works, not how much water is left in the reservoir behind the house.
A better proxy is red blood cell (RBC) magnesium, which reflects what is inside cells and tracks tissue status more faithfully. I use it in preference to serum when the question is genuine status rather than an acute emergency.
I want to be careful here, because it would be easy to oversell RBC testing the way serum is oversold. It is not a perfect gold standard. In acute illness, for example, red-cell magnesium can be pushed around by changes in the red cells themselves and should be read with caution (Ref 8). No single blood test captures whole-body magnesium cleanly; the honest position is that RBC is generally the more informative of the two commonly available options, not that it is infallible.
A word about the clinicians ordering these tests. If your doctor told you your magnesium was normal on a serum test, that is not a failing on their part. Serum magnesium is what standard laboratory pathways offer, it is what guidelines and local formularies point to, and a busy GP is working within those constraints. The useful move is not to distrust the doctor but to ask, specifically, which test was run, and whether an RBC magnesium is available to you privately or on request.
Reading the label: elemental versus compound weight
Before comparing forms, there is a trap on almost every label. When a product says "400 mg Magnesium Citrate," that 400 mg is the weight of the entire compound, the magnesium plus whatever it is bound to. The elemental magnesium, the part that does the physiological work, is only a fraction of it.
The fractions follow directly from molecular weight, so they are chemistry rather than opinion. Magnesium oxide is roughly sixty per cent elemental magnesium by weight. Magnesium citrate is around sixteen per cent. Magnesium bisglycinate sits near fourteen per cent. Magnesium L-threonate is lower still, roughly eight per cent, which is why threonate products ask you to take one and a half to two grams of compound to deliver little more than a hundred milligrams of elemental magnesium.
The practical rule is simple and, unlike much of what follows, not in scientific dispute: find the elemental magnesium figure on the label. If a product hides it and quotes only the compound weight, treat that opacity as a reason to look elsewhere. A well-run manufacturer states the elemental dose plainly.
Do the forms really differ? Bioavailability, honestly
Here the internet is more confident than the data. A popular claim is that magnesium oxide is almost useless because only about four per cent of it is absorbed, while organic salts such as citrate and glycinate are far superior. There is a real signal underneath this, but the picture is messier than the slogan.
Some controlled comparisons do find organic or specially formulated salts raising blood magnesium more smoothly than oxide (Ref 10). Others find the opposite: in one short randomised comparison, magnesium oxide actually produced a larger rise in blood magnesium than citrate or carbonate (Ref 9). Absorption also depends on dose, on whether it is taken with food, and on how depleted the person is to begin with. So the specific "four per cent" figure is best treated as a widely repeated number rather than a settled constant, and the ranking of salts by usefulness is genuinely contested.
My own reading is that form probably does matter, both for absorption and for the co-molecule attached (glycine and taurine, for instance, have effects of their own). But I hold that as a working view, not a certainty. If good head-to-head trials showed the differences to be smaller than I think, I would be glad to update. Keeping a position revisable is part of keeping it honest, and this is an area where I am still collecting data rather than closing the question.
Matching the form to the problem
With that caution in place, here is how I think about the common forms. The pattern below leans partly on mechanism, partly on trials, and partly on consistent patient report, and I have tried to flag which is which.
Sleep and a low, unexplained tension: magnesium glycinate. Magnesium is bound to glycine, an amino acid with its own calming profile, and the glycinate form tends to be gentle on the gut. For general repletion and sleep it is my usual default. The trial evidence for magnesium and sleep is real but modest: a systematic review of older adults found magnesium shortened the time taken to fall asleep by around seventeen minutes versus placebo, while noting that the underlying studies were small and of low quality (Ref 22). In other words, a reasonable, low-risk thing to try, not a sedative.
There is one caveat I rarely see mentioned, and I offer it as mechanism rather than established fact. Vitamin B6 is a cofactor for the enzyme that converts glyoxylate to glycine; when B6 is lacking, more glyoxylate is diverted into oxalate instead, so in someone deficient in B6 a high glycine load could, in theory, nudge oxalate production upward (Ref 30). I would keep this in proportion, though: the same work found no association between vitamin B6 intake and kidney-stone risk in the general population, so this is a mechanistic flag rather than a demonstrated hazard. If you have a history of kidney stones or a known B-vitamin deficiency it is worth being aware of, which is part of why several glycinate products include B6.
Palpitations, ectopic beats, and blood pressure: magnesium taurate. The rationale is appealing: taurine has membrane-stabilising effects on heart muscle cells, and magnesium calms the same cells through calcium-channel control, so pairing them looks synergistic. I want to be precise about the evidence, because it is easy to overstate. Randomised trials show that magnesium supplementation in general lowers blood pressure by a modest amount, on the order of two millimetres of mercury for systolic pressure at a median dose of around 370 mg per day (Ref 12). Separately, randomised trials show that taurine on its own lowers blood pressure in people with high-normal readings (Ref 13). What we do not have is a large randomised trial of the specific magnesium taurate salt for blood pressure; the direct evidence for the combined membrane effect is mechanistic and, in the cleanest experiments, done in animal heart cells rather than in people (Ref 14). So it is reasonable to try, and colleagues report patients helped by it alongside conventional treatment, but I would frame it as plausible symptom management rather than a cure. Palpitations and hypertension have many causes, so this is a conversation to have with the doctor supervising your care, not a reason to change cardiac medication yourself.
Constipation: magnesium citrate, or oxide. This one has the most straightforward evidence. Magnesium salts draw water into the bowel by osmosis, acting as a gentle osmotic laxative. A randomised trial found magnesium oxide as effective as senna, and clearly better than placebo, for chronic constipation (Ref 15). If cost matters and the goal is gut motility, this is an effective, inexpensive use of magnesium. I would not reach for citrate first for sleep or cardiac purposes, but for the bowel it does the job.
Fatigue, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain: magnesium malate. Malate is bound to malic acid, a molecule that sits inside the Krebs cycle, the pathway cells use to extract usable fuel as ATP, which is the theoretical reason it is favoured for fatigue states. Honesty requires flagging that the human evidence is thin. The best-known trial of a malic-acid-plus-magnesium product in fibromyalgia found no clear benefit at the blinded, controlled dose; improvement appeared only later in an unblinded, higher-dose phase, which is a much weaker kind of evidence (Ref 16). A Cochrane review of combination treatments could not find enough good data to support it (Ref 17). I mention malate because patients do report benefit and the mechanism is coherent, but I would present it as an adjunct worth a careful trial, not a proven treatment. One practical note that does hold up in experience: take it in the morning, as some people find it mildly stimulating late in the day.
Cognition and brain ageing: magnesium L-threonate. Threonate was designed to raise magnesium levels in the brain, and it does appear to cross into the central nervous system more readily than other forms, rather like a molecule carrying the right passport for the border. The human trials are genuinely interesting and genuinely preliminary. Small randomised studies report improvements in memory and cognition, including in older adults, and a separate trial reports better sleep and daytime function (Ref 18, Ref 19, Ref 20). Two cautions belong next to those results. First, several of these studies are small and were conducted or funded by parties with a commercial interest in the ingredient, which does not invalidate them but does lower how much weight I place on them. Second, much of the mechanistic and disease-model work is in mice, not people, and animal findings do not always translate (Ref 21). My position is that threonate may modestly help rather than reverse age-related cognitive change, that it is best seen as an add-on for cognitive goals rather than a first choice, and that its low elemental content makes it an expensive way to correct a simple deficiency. Some users report vivid dreams, which is harmless but worth knowing.
Getting value from vitamin D. This interaction is underappreciated and well grounded. The enzymes that activate vitamin D require magnesium as a cofactor, so if magnesium is low you may not get the full benefit of the vitamin D you are taking (Ref 11). If you supplement vitamin D, I would treat adequate magnesium as part of the same protocol in most circumstances, rather than an optional extra.
The form to be wary of: magnesium oxide in cheap multivitamins. Oxide is inexpensive and high in elemental magnesium by weight, and it does have a legitimate use as a laxative. My reservation is narrower: it is the default filler in many low-cost combination products, and, absorption debate notwithstanding, if your magnesium supplement never seems to do anything it is worth checking whether oxide is the only form in it.
Who genuinely stands to benefit
Most people do not need a supplement if their diet is adequate. Some groups are different, and here specificity matters more than enthusiasm. In every case below, I am describing patterns, not diagnosing you, because I cannot assess you through a screen and your circumstances may differ.
Older adults. Absorption tends to fall with age and gut transit changes, and this group is also more likely to be taking the acid-suppressing drugs discussed below. I lean towards gentler forms such as glycinate or malate, starting low, around 100 mg elemental, and increasing slowly if needed and tolerated.
Perimenopausal and menopausal women. This is an under-studied group that, in my experience and that of colleagues, often responds well, with magnesium potentially easing several overlapping complaints (disturbed sleep, low mood or tension, and the bone-health picture) at once. Glycinate suits the sleep and mood component; a form like malate suits fatigue. I would add that diet and lifestyle do the heavy lifting here and that magnesium is one tool among several, not a hormonal substitute.
People taking proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole, lansoprazole and similar). This is the safety point I feel most strongly about, and it is rarely mentioned to patients. Long-term PPI use lowers magnesium, because reducing stomach acid impairs magnesium absorption in the gut (Ref 24). At the extreme, there are documented cases of dangerously low magnesium causing serious heart-rhythm disturbances in long-term users, which is why regulators have advised checking magnesium in people on these drugs (Ref 25). I would put two honest caveats beside that. First, across the millions of people taking PPIs this severe outcome is uncommon, and the observational data show association more than proven cause (Ref 26). Second, and importantly, none of this is a reason to stop a PPI on your own. If you take one, the sensible step is to have your magnesium checked, ideally RBC rather than serum, and to raise supplementation with the prescriber who started it. The message is monitor, not self-deprescribe.
People with kidney disease. Here the caution runs the other way. The kidneys regulate how much magnesium is excreted, so when kidney function is impaired, magnesium can accumulate to harmful levels. If you have kidney disease, magnesium supplementation needs medical supervision and is not something to start from a video or an article.
Athletes, sauna users, and heavy sweaters. Intense training and sweating do increase magnesium losses, and correcting a genuine shortfall is reasonable. I would temper expectations about performance, though: a review of supplementation trials in athletes found that, once a real deficiency is excluded, extra magnesium does not reliably improve strength or endurance (Ref 27). So this is about replacing what is lost and supporting recovery, not about ergogenic magic.
Pregnancy. I want to correct something I have said too loosely in the past, and that is often repeated online, namely that magnesium is one of the best-supported supplements in pregnancy. The picture is more mixed than that. The strong evidence in pregnancy is for intravenous magnesium sulfate to prevent seizures in pre-eclampsia, which is a hospital treatment, not an over-the-counter supplement (Ref 1). For the everyday claim, oral magnesium for pregnancy leg cramps, the trials are inconsistent and of low certainty: one randomised trial found no benefit over placebo, and a Cochrane review concluded the evidence does not clearly establish that it works (Ref 28, Ref 29). Magnesium may still be reasonable in pregnancy, but any supplementation should be discussed with your midwife or obstetrician, and I would no longer describe the oral evidence as strong.
Testing, and a reasonable therapeutic trial
Putting the testing question together: the default serum magnesium your doctor orders reflects blood plasma, with a typical reference range around 0.7 to 1.0 millimoles per litre, and because the body defends that level it can look normal despite real depletion (Ref 6). RBC magnesium is the more informative option and can be requested privately or, sometimes, on the standard pathway. You will see "optimal" RBC ranges quoted online that are tighter than the laboratory's normal range; I would treat those optimal figures as opinion rather than established thresholds, because a reference range tells you where the population sits, not necessarily where you feel best.
There is also a pragmatic route that does not require paying for tests. If you have several of the symptoms described earlier, a time-limited trial of a well-absorbed form, glycinate being my usual choice, is entirely reasonable and is often cheaper than testing. In that sense the trial itself yields information: if adequate magnesium in a sensible form relieves the symptoms, that tells you something useful. It is worth saying plainly that this is a way of gathering evidence about your own response, not a diagnosis, and not a cure for whatever underlying issue produced the symptoms.
Dosing, and what to expect
I will give rough figures, because the vague "200 to 400 mg" advice is not very actionable, while stressing that these are starting points to discuss with your own clinician, not prescriptions for an individual I have not met. They are drawn from the pattern across many trials rather than any single one.
For general repletion and sleep, magnesium glycinate starting around 200 mg elemental at night, titrated towards 300 to 400 mg over a few weeks if tolerated. For blood-pressure support, magnesium taurate in the region of 125 to 150 mg elemental twice daily with food, in the range most trials of magnesium have used. For fatigue states, magnesium malate 200 to 300 mg elemental in the morning rather than at night. For cognitive goals, magnesium L-threonate following the product's dosing, accepting that its low elemental content is the point of the format.
Two expectations matter more than the exact numbers. First, repletion is slow. Restoring magnesium inside cells and tissues takes weeks, not days, so you should judge the effect over roughly six to twelve weeks rather than after the first fortnight. You will sometimes see a very precise half-life figure quoted for this; I have not been able to trace it to a source I trust, so I would rather give the honest guidance, allow a couple of months, than repeat a number I cannot stand behind. Second, tolerability is dose-dependent: loose stools are the osmotic effect at high doses, particularly with citrate and oxide, and the fix is to reduce the dose and build up more slowly, often splitting it between morning and evening.
Food first
I should be clear about where I actually land, because it is not on a shelf of bottles. My preference, for myself, is to address the root cause, which is diet, before reaching for a supplement. In keeping with the way I eat and the way I advise, I favour getting minerals from animal foods and from a good unrefined salt rather than from the plant sources conventional lists reach for first. In practice, for me, that means using a quality unrefined salt, such as a Celtic sea salt, generously on real food, which supplies a spread of minerals together, tastes good, costs little, and treats the underlying pattern rather than a single number. Whole, salted animal foods do a great deal of this work quietly.
Supplements are tools for specific situations, several of which I have described above. They are not, in my view, a substitute for a diet that would not have produced the shortfall in the first place. That is also why there are no brand names, discount codes, or affiliate links anywhere in this piece.
Conclusion
Magnesium rewards precision and punishes slogans. The parts worth holding onto are unglamorous: it is a genuinely central mineral, shortfall is common, the routine blood test can miss it, and the number on the label is rarely the number that matters. The fashionable distinctions between forms probably carry some truth, but less cleanly than they are sold, and the evidence for specific uses runs from reasonable to weak in a way that deserves to be named rather than blurred. If you have been told your magnesium is normal but still have the symptoms, ask which test was used. If you take a long-term acid-suppressing drug, have your magnesium checked. And if you decide to supplement, buy on the elemental figure, choose the form to fit the problem, give it a couple of months, and remember that the aim is to correct a diet, not to replace one.
Disclosures
I have no commercial interest in any magnesium product or supplement brand, and no discount codes or affiliate links. I offer private consultations for people who want to think through their own situation, but I would put that in proportion: for most people a good, regular relationship with a local clinician is worth more than a single consultation with me, and there are many excellent clinicians who can help with this. Nothing here is individual medical advice, and decisions about medication, including any drug you already take, should be made with your own prescriber.
References
Identified and verified via PubMed; DOI links included.
de Baaij JHF, Hoenderop JGJ, Bindels RJM. Magnesium in man: implications for health and disease. Physiological Reviews, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2014
Fatima G, Dzupina A, Alhmadi HB, et al. Magnesium Matters: A Comprehensive Review of Its Vital Role in Health and Diseases. Cureus, 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71392
Volpe SL. Magnesium in disease prevention and overall health. Advances in Nutrition, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.003483
Bara M, Guiet-Bara A, Durlach J. Regulation of sodium and potassium pathways by magnesium in cell membranes. Magnesium Research, 1993. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8274363/
Matek Sarić M, Sorić T, Juko Kasap Ž, et al. Magnesium: Health Effects, Deficiency Burden, and Future Public Health Directions. Nutrients, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223626
Costello RB, Elin RJ, Rosanoff A, et al. Perspective: The Case for an Evidence-Based Reference Interval for Serum Magnesium: The Time Has Come. Advances in Nutrition, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.116.012765
Hermes Sales C, Azevedo Nascimento D, Queiroz Medeiros AC, et al. There is chronic latent magnesium deficiency in apparently healthy university students. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2014.30.1.7510
Martin BJ, Lyon TD, Fell GS, McKay P. Erythrocyte magnesium in elderly patients: not a reliable guide to magnesium status. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0946-672X(97)80009-0
Ivanovic ND, Radosavljevic B, Zekovic M, et al. Effects of short-term magnesium supplementation on ionized, total magnesium and other relevant electrolytes levels. Biometals, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-022-00363-y
Pajuelo D, Meissner JM, Negra T, Connolly A, Mullor JL. Comparative Clinical Study on Magnesium Absorption and Side Effects After Oral Intake of Microencapsulated Magnesium Versus Other Magnesium Sources. Nutrients, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244367
Uwitonze AM, Razzaque MS. Role of Magnesium in Vitamin D Activation and Function. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 2018. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2018.037
Zhang X, Li Y, Del Gobbo LC, et al. Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trials. Hypertension, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07664
Sun Q, Wang B, Li Y, et al. Taurine Supplementation Lowers Blood Pressure and Improves Vascular Function in Prehypertension: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Hypertension, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06624
Zhao L, Lou J, Wu H, Yin Y, Kang Y. Effects of taurine-magnesium coordination compound on ionic channels in rat ventricular myocytes of arrhythmia induced by ouabain. Biological Trace Element Research, 2012 (animal / in-vitro study). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-9317-1
Morishita D, Tomita T, Mori S, et al. Senna Versus Magnesium Oxide for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000942
Russell IJ, Michalek JE, Flechas JD, Abraham GE. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with Super Malic: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover pilot study. Journal of Rheumatology, 1995 (benefit only in unblinded high-dose phase). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8587088/
Thorpe J, Shum B, Moore RA, Wiffen PJ, Gilron I. Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010585.pub2
Zhang C, Hu Q, Li S, et al. A Magtein, Magnesium L-Threonate, -Based Formula Improves Brain Cognitive Functions in Healthy Chinese Adults. Nutrients, 2022 (combination formula; industry-linked). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245235
Liu G, Weinger JG, Lu ZL, Xue F, Sadeghpour S. Efficacy and Safety of MMFS-01, a Synapse Density Enhancer, for Treating Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2016 (industry-sponsored). https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150538
Hausenblas HA, Lynch T, Hooper S, et al. Magnesium-L-threonate improves sleep quality and daytime functioning in adults with self-reported sleep problems: A randomized controlled trial. Sleep Medicine: X, 2024 (industry-affiliated). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleepx.2024.100121
Liao W, Wei J, Liu C, et al. Magnesium-L-threonate treats Alzheimer's disease by modulating the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Neural Regeneration Research, 2023 (animal model, APP/PS1 mice). https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.391310
Mah J, Pitre T. Oral magnesium supplementation for insomnia in older adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 2021 (low to very-low quality evidence). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03297-z
von Luckner A, Riederer F. Magnesium in Migraine Prophylaxis: Is There an Evidence-Based Rationale? A Systematic Review. Headache, 2017 (Grade C, possibly effective). https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13217
Gommers LMM, Hoenderop JGJ, de Baaij JHF. Mechanisms of proton pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia. Acta Physiologica, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13846
Chrysant SG. Proton pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia complicated with serious cardiac arrhythmias. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2019.1615446
William JH, Danziger J. Proton-pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia: Current research and proposed mechanisms. World Journal of Nephrology, 2016 (association, causation not proven). https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.152
Newhouse IJ, Finstad EW. The effects of magnesium supplementation on exercise performance. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200007000-00008
Araújo CAL, Lorena SB, Cavalcanti GCS, Leão GLS, Tenório GP, Alves JGB. Oral magnesium supplementation for leg cramps in pregnancy: An observational controlled trial. PLoS One, 2020 (no benefit over placebo). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227497
Luo L, Zhou K, Zhang J, Xu L, Yin W. Interventions for leg cramps in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020 (low / very-low certainty evidence). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010655.pub3
Ferraro PM, Taylor EN, Gambaro G, Curhan GC. Vitamin B6 intake and the risk of incident kidney stones. Urolithiasis, 2017 (supports the B6 / glyoxylate / oxalate mechanism; found no association between B6 intake and stone risk in the general population). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0999-5
